Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed. Definition of lifting the corporate veil in the legal dictionary by free online english dictionary and encyclopedia. Lifting the veil of incorporation under common law and. The court will make the members or the controlling persons liable for debts and obligations of the company. Lifting or piercing the veil is corporate laws most widely used doctrine to decide when a shareholder or shareholders will be held liable for obligations of the corporation. Adams v cape industries plc 1990 rejected single economic unit argument. To lift or not to lift the corporate veil the unfinished story. Meaning of lifting the corporate veil as a legal term. Principle of lifting the corporate veil legal service india. Lifting of corporate veil with reference to leading cases.
Lifting the corporate veil as the company is a separate legal entity, is has been provided with a veil, compared to that of individuals who are managing the company. The paper does not cover the statutory provisions for lifting of corporate veil. Jan 07, 2015 the corporate veil may be lifted where the statute itself contemplates lifting the veil or fraud or improper conduct is intended to be prevented. Lifting the veil occurs where the courts or law disregard the corporate personality of the company in deserving circumstances. Iowa court of appeals says llc corporate veil properly pierced. Salomon is the judicial authority that enforces the legal personality of corporate entity especially when it has been incorporated. Nov 18, 20 meaning of lifting of the corporate veil doctrine of lifting the veil. Approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil by. In this essay, an attempt has been made to explain the.
Piercing the corporate veil under the new companies act. Meaning of lifting of the corporate veil doctrine of lifting the veil. Dec 2012 when a company registered under the act, all the dealings with the company will be in the name of company, and the members will be disregarded. The aim of the paper is to explore recent case law in order to determine whether courts have moved away from an overly restrictive approach when dealing with cases relating to the corporate personality. However, certain activities of the companies warrant lifting of corporate veil. The english courts have been often asked to disregard the separate legal personality of a company and its shareholders. The three justifications for piercing the corporate veil. Term paper on lifting of corporate veil under judicial. Piercing the corporate veil, financial responsibility, and the limits. Lord sumption sets out in his judgement two ways in which the corporate veil can be pierced. Similarly in vtb, lord neuberger thought that it was unnecessary to decide whether, in truth, there is a difference in this context between piercing and lifting the corporate veil at 119. Lifting the veil doctrine exists as a check on the principle that, in general, investor shareholders should not be held liable for the debts of their corporation beyond. The phrase piercing the corporate veil was described in a 1973 case as now fashionable. Lifting the corporate veil the courts have been extremely protective of the salomon principle, and it is only in extreme circumstances that they will consider lifting the veil.
Principle of lifting the corporate veil there is often talk about how a company is a person in eyes of law. Purpose the paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. In these instances the application has extended to eliminating the use of the corporate form to avoid legitimate obligations. For example, veil piercing may be done where the corporation is the mere alterego of its shareholders, where the corporation is undercapitalized, where there is a failure to observe corporate formalities, where the corporate form is used to promote fraud, injustice or illegalities. A company is treated as if its a human of its own kind. Subsequently, in prest, however, lord neuberger appeared to. Here in the present case, the respondent was a well off man. But if the court feels that such veil has to been used for any wrongful purpose, the court lifts the corporate veil and makes the individual liable for such acts which they should. The courts will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of lifting or piercing the corporate veil. Mar 27, 2014 for example, veil piercing may be done where the corporation is the mere alterego of its shareholders, where the corporation is undercapitalized, where there is a failure to observe corporate formalities, where the corporate form is used to promote fraud, injustice or illegalities. Alter ego theory traditionally, most veilpiercing cases were premised on the alter ego theory. Pdf upon acquisition of legal personality a company enjoys certain attributes such as limited liability.
Lifting the veil of incorporation or piercing the corporate veil means the judicial act of. Boghtbarthet, the governing law of companies in eu law, hp oxford 2012, at 57. The lifting of the corporate veil implies neglecting the corporate personality and looking for the genuine individual who is in the control of the organization. They try to save the corporate legal entity in all most all the cases, even if it is necessary to lift corporate veil to ensure justice. Lifting the veil on piercing the veil ssrn pdf book. Lifting the corporate veil limited liability pages.
This doctrine emphasizes that a company has a separate entity from its. Lifting the corporate veil provisions under the companies. This article analyses the common law doctrine of piercing of the corporate veil in the context of tort liabilities of a company. The law has the ability to lift up the corporate cloak in the event that it is vital for tax avoidance. The paper aims to study and analyze the concept of lifting the corporate veil and the instances in which court can lift it. Commonly, grossly inadequate capitalization, few shareholders, a disregard of corporate. In adeyemi v lan and baker nig ltd, the court held that there is nothing sacrosanct about the veil of incorporation. Lifting the corporate veil legal definition of lifting the. Piercing or lifting the veil is corporate laws most widely used doctrine to decide when a shareholder or shareholders will be held liable for obligations of the corporation.
Alter ego theory traditionally, most veil piercing cases were premised on the alter ego theory. From peeping behind the corporate veil, to ignoring it. Jun 12, 20 company law lifting of corporate veil with reference to leading case shagun singh 15. Piercing the corporate veil in australia melbourne law school. In these cases, courts look beyond the form to the substance of the corporations actions. There have been cases where the doctrine of lifting or piercing the corporate veil has been applied outside instances of commercial abuse or fraud. Lifting of corporate veil or disregarding of the corporate personality is common buzz in the modern corporate arena. This undermines the notion that salomon occupies the centre stage in corporate.
It constitutes the bedrock principle upon which company is regarded as. Piercing of the corporate veil for evasion of tort obligations. At the end of the day, where a false and deceptive utilize is made of the legitimate entity, the people concerned wont be permitted to take shield behind the corporate personality. The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. Piercing the corporate veil lawshelf educational media. Part 1 company law revision preliminary, its features. To offer a full account of the exceptions to the corporate personality doctrine, this paper also. The veil shall be lifted to prevent the avoidance of recognition by the eyes of equity. To lift or not to lift the corporate veil the unfinished.
In these cases courts lift the corporate veil to make members liable for the actions of the company. Tjio, lifting the veil on piercing the veil, 19 lmclq 2014, at 20. Lifting or piercing of corporate veil circumstances in. In what circumstances will the cayman courts lift the. Limitation the paper only deals about lifting of corporate veil in general and the instances in which court can life it. Doctrine of lifting the veil of incorporation adeleye, peace. It continues to be one of the most litigated and most discussed doctrines in all of corporate law. Common law countries usually uphold this principle of. It also ruled that recognizing the corporate structure in this case would promote injustice. There are however instances where the separate corporate personality can be. Analysis of the development is done by looking at the veil piercing doctrines under u. It is generally accepted that the veil piercing doctrine can be applied where a company is used to evade existing legal obligations but not where a.
In several states, short of outright fraud andor criminal conduct, the corporate existence will remain sacrosanct. The piercing or lifting of a corporate veil is in the interest of justice. A critical analysis of common law principles in lifting the corporate veil. Under statutory provisions under judicial interpretation 4. In other words, where a fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity, the individuals concerned will not be allowed to take shelter behind the corporate personality. Heyo guys, much awaited company law revision lectures are here you are watching part i preliminary sec 12, company, its features, lifting of corporate veil and many more things. However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the australian cases relating to this doctrine. From its inception veilpiercing has been a scourge on corporate law.
This paper is written as a comparative study of the development of the corporate veil piercing doctrine throughout the years. The standards for piercing the corporate veil and why they vary. It constitutes the bedrock principle upon which company is regarded as an entity distinct from. It is generally accepted that the veil piercing doctrine can be applied where a company is used to evade existing legal obligations but not where a company is used to avoid future legal obligations.
It was made clear by the court that the company law principles of piercing the corporate veil applied and that judges should not take a broad brush approach. Company law lifting of corporate veil with reference to leading case shagun singh 15. The concept of the group as a single economic entity could not justify any departure from the normal rule that each company in a group of companies is a separate. However, there are several exceptions to this principle. Therefore, the salomon principle remains an important part of corporate law today. Approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil by liton. Aug 12, 2012 the courts will break through the corporate shell and apply the principle of lifting or piercing the corporate veil. Pdf approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil. Once a company is formed and registered under this act, it is a separate legal entity distinct from its members. The court in the present case noted that it was not disputed that rajoos son anantha was the 50% shareholder and codirector in bumitulin, and the fact that rajoo was a former director of. Piercing the corporate veil a short discussion cannot do justice to the developments in the area of corporate veil piercing in texas over the last 30 years. Piercing the corporate veil lund university publications. Hence one of the grounds for lifting up the corporate veil is to determine the character of the company. It is given mandate to provide various kinds of information such as minutes of meetings, number of directors, list of objects for what the company is formed and others.
However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the australian cases relating to piercing the corporate veil. Lifting the corporate veil piercing the corporate veil. The courts justification for lifting or piercing the corporate veil in cases involving category i situations is to be found in the policy of the statute or the intention of the parties to the contract e. The trial court based its decision on the fact that the llc did not have adequate capitalization. Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. The claimant has prayed for the respondents directorsmembers to pay the decree personally or be committed to civil jail for six months because they have acted dishonestly by giving bouncing cheque and by hiding from creditors by relocating offices to an unknown address. It is neither necessary nor desirable to enumerate the classes of cases where lifting the veil is permissible, since that must necessarily depend on the relevant statutory or other provisions, the. Download page essay on lifting the corporate veil limited liability 2020. The authors shall also discuss its history and subsequent evolution and the various approaches in form of theories which the courts have adopted while deciding whether or not to pierce the corporate veil. Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding the corporate personality and looking behind the real person who are in the control of the company. The subject of lifting the veil is well kflowfl in the literature on company law.
One final note on piercing the corporate veil is that states often vary radically in the extent to which they are willing to go to protect the corporation as an entity. Natal the dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of master of laws, by coursework, faculty of law, university of natal. This shows that there is a veil drawn between the company and its members. One of the fundamental principles of company law is that a company has personality that is distinct of its shareholders. In this article, we present the results of the first such study. Subsequently, in prest, however, lord neuberger appeared to link lifting with concealment cases and piercing. Over the years, they have taken an inconsistent approach and so categorising the situations is. In some cases the corporate veil has not been lifted prime examples of that are adams v. Over the years, they have taken an inconsistent approach and so categorising the situations is difficult. With a dataset of 2,908 cases from 1658 to 2006, this study presents the. Apr 22, 2020 download page essay on lifting the corporate veil limited liability 2020.
488 121 514 439 884 1494 249 191 377 1515 364 371 158 1607 1442 341 1524 4 876 915 361 973 1118 1028 607 785 112 1138 175 346 1082 1229 209 284 148 841 1198 66 415 1476 901